![avast smart scan settings avast smart scan settings](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/howtochangethedefaultsettingsofavast-180111051617/85/how-to-change-the-default-settings-of-avast-free-antivirus-3-320.jpg)
One will suspect the other one's activities as malicious.Īvast is trying to scan your router/default gateway and Norton flags it as malicious here. This is probably an issue with the co-existance' of multiple realtime AV software. To stop being notified for this type of traffic, in the The attack was resulted from \DEVICE\HARDDISKVOLUME4\PROGRAM FILES\AVAST Network traffic from 10.100.100.1/cgi-bin/a2/out.cgi matches the signature ofĪ known attack.
![avast smart scan settings avast smart scan settings](https://i1.wp.com/productkeyforfree.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/avast-license-key.jpg)
![avast smart scan settings avast smart scan settings](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/howtochangethedefaultsettingsofavast-180111051617/95/how-to-change-the-default-settings-of-avast-free-antivirus-2-638.jpg)
It is brief, and in Arabic, I guess.Īctivity: An intrusion attempt by OFFICE2 was blocked. I have found only one link with a similar case.The point in question here is beyond the convenience or not of having both active. My intention is to let go Norton when the trial period expires, but for the time being, both are active.OFFICE2 is the name of my computer (unless some device replicated it). It is confusing about who were the attacker and attacked. It mentions 4 items involving 2 different IPs.
#AVAST SMART SCAN SETTINGS DRIVERS#
It was not operative since I do not have the drivers installed yet, but perhaps it was involved in the attack. I had plugged an external long range Wi-Fi adapter for the first time in my PC.Norton "blamed" Avast, in my own computer, for the attempt. I received a warning from Norton about a OS Attack: GNU Bash CVE-2014-6271 intrusion attempt. I have a Toshiba notebook, which came with Norton Internet Security.